But the tablet is kind of fun, for the record.
All posts in Uncategorized
Congratulations, you’re the winner of the leather journal, chosen by my lovely assistant, a random interweb number picker (after adjusting for super advanced math concepts such as multiple posts by the same person, etc.)
Alex, e-mail me your mailing address and I shall whisk the prize off to you.
Yet another drawing for a new prize is just around the corner. At this rate, I need to hire a slick-haired elderly gentleman with a booming voice to handle all these contests.
Here is a strangely comforting forum discussion about the scourge of the dwindling attention span.
I know that I have some questions to answer about the typewriter journal project. I am assembling a Q&A, so look for it in the next week. Note that the deadline is June 15th, not May 30th. (Do you get the sense I am winging the details of this project? Worry not. It will get done.)
In other news, welcome to the First Official Strikethru Drawing For A Random Prize (FOSDFARP), which in this case is a set of three typewriter buttons from the Regional Assembly of Text.
Instructions to win: leave a comment on this post, in which you make a random remark about ephemera, pens, buttons, typewriters, cameras, or any related item of paper-based nerd-dom, for the entertainment of your fellow entrants.
You: “I’m too cool to enter this drawing.”
Me: Wrong. Everyone into this general scribeomechanical hobby is a nerd. Face facts.
You: “I don’t wear buttons.”
Me: I am sure you know a person/bulletin board that does, and we need to get the typewriting message out there, my friends.
You: “How will you pick the winner?”
Me: The winner will be chosen at random and announced on the blog sometime in June. Winner will e-mail me their address, and I will send em off this cool set of buttons, whereupon they shall bask in the glory of winning the FOSDFARP.
You: “Why the hell are you having a FOSDFARP? What is this, Publisher’s Clearing House?”
Me: I thought someone might like some typewriter buttons, and it’s time to shake things up out there in the typosphere. It’s CONTEST TIME!!!
Leave a comment. You know you want to. By the way, are there any new or prospective typecasters out there that aren’t listed in my Typosphere list? If so, I want to hear about it.
Finally got around to making a project out of this book. Granted, it’s a modest attempt, but that’s the fun thing about making books– you can put them together from junk paper lying around the house. The cover of this one is an old sheet of watercolor paper that someone used to clean rubber stamps.
Uh oh, Esther Smith has another book, too. Look out, wallet.
There are a healthy number of institutions devoted to preserving and teaching book arts; many major cities in the United States have them, by way of example (Philadelphia, San Francisco, New York, Minneapolis, oh, there’s tons more).
I bring this up because I am curious about this craft, in the context of print media’s often forecasted demise. I came across an interesting debate about this topic, which I highly recommend to those in the Luddosphere. The article discusses whether written words will ultimately have a useful and longer life on paper or in pixels: should all text be “searchable, discoverable, linkable, part of the conversation,” or is it true that the unedited, unprofessional digi-screeds of the masses (cough cough) are by definition etherial and destined for deletion?
I find this subject fascinating. Do you? It seems that book arts are more popular than ever before, as evidenced by the endless institutions devoted to the craft. I wonder if this bears any reactionary relation to the fact that the digital age seems hell-bent on removing tactile experience from all forms of media.
Changing the subject somewhat: Brian Dettmer, book artist
Probably a subject for a separate post: the typewriter is not the only 20th century icon of literature being eviscerated for museum display. Brian Dettmer creates sculptures (called “book autopsies” in the case of books) from all manner of fading communications media: records, tapes, books, maps. Of such media, he is quoted as saying “their intended role has decreased or deceased and they often exist simply as symbols of the ideas they represent rather than true conveyers of content.”
I have two reactions to this kind of increasingly popular transmogrification of media into symbol. My less sophisticated reaction: it’s grisly and some could argue disrespectful, like Bodies: the exhibition. It implies that language is entirely separate from the forms that carry and create it, and the latter has no lasting value save for irony.
A more nuanced reaction might be this: I love technology, and the fact that it makes possible the sharing of ideas like these with like-minded people. I don’t want to go back to pre-digital times. But I’d like to think digital communication can be used in the service of good: to preserve, cherish, and even further the use and enjoyment of iconic, fascinating, and useful creations like books and typewriters. Centers for book arts, like those I mentioned above, are exactly the kinds of places where the benefits of technology and tradition can intersect for the public good.
Center for the preservation and perserverence of the typewriter, anyone? Any venture capitalists out there with me?
Update: Brian Dettmer’s work is currently on display in Chicago, at the Packer Schopf gallery. The page I just linked to has an interesting analysis of “object-based media” in the digital age, and the meaning behind Dettmer’s work:
Books age like humans: they become discolored and stiff, and eventually their pages crumble into dust. Dettmer’s tactile book-sculptures are metaphors for the decline of natural, physical media in the face of the digital, which escapes the laws of nature through lacking any single physical form. At the same time, the sheer volume and solidity of these paper peaks and valleys suggest a sense of stability and soundness that digital information necessarily lacks. We see in Dettmer’s books the simultaneous vulnerability and resilience of material forms.
I do think this is a compelling topic to explore in art, but I can’t say I take any aesthetic pleasure in the destruction of books and typewriters to make a statement. That doesn’t necessarily mean that I universally denigrate the work of artists like Dettmer, however. I just wonder if there is a different way that art could explore this issue. Thoughts?
Did I mention that I am getting a little desk of sorts to replace the notorious Dave?
So, this Hermes 3000 and I, we don’t have the best relationship. It just sits there like a stubborn turtle with its arching, spoon-handle carriage return lever and chicklet keys and crumbling, duct-taped platen knobs, and I can’t seem to see what Larry McMurtry sees in this machine.
What I want to know is, where the rest of you clock in on the Hermes 3000? It’s the Cadillac of typewriters, right? Someone set me straight here.
Did I mention the story above turns out improbably well? For the relative, not for the fate of typewriters, I mean.
Ah, the Old Mill is the name of the place we were, thank you interweb. I hear a recent fire did some damage to the structure.
Enough about me. While we’re sitting here drinking moonshine and reminiscing about the year in typewriters, what was your favorite typewriting moment in 2008?
I’ve always been a little annoyed by internet video. The buffering wait times bring to mind the 56 kpbs download days, where you’d sit there and watch an image on your screen inchworm itself into existence while your blood pressure ticked up a notch. I vowed I’d stay away from this so-called innovation as a blogger, but then these darned fancy little Flip cameras came along, and here I am thinking about doing some videocasting about typewriters and pens and whatnot. Because you can only take so many videos of your kid.
Trying to brainstorm topics… Stalking typewriters at thrift stores? Live pen comparison tests?
***a few hours later***
Ok, not exactly Wim Wenders here, and not even a Flip camera (rather, an old Canon Elph) but here is some poorly executed stalker footage I took of the many dozens of typewriters that line the shelves of Island Books on Mercer Island, Washington. The typewriters line many walls of the store, this is just one section. They are all on the top of a very high bookshelf, thus, I had to hold the camera aloft, surely looking insane in the process. Luckily, only the bookseller was present at the time, since it was right after the place opened on a glum, post-Christmas Sunday.
I will try in earnest to supply superior footage to this in future filming attempts.
Moving on to floaty pens.
There is a floaty pen blogger out there. Check it out. Thus far I have learned that quality varies in the floaty pen world, and that one would do best to focus on those made by the Eskesen company, which explains floating action technology on its Web site.
I remembered that a friend of mine and my husband’s had once been in the habit of gifting my husband with floaty pens. Thus, I banished him to the attic on a 30 degree night to rummage in boxes of old office supplies until he descended, covered in spiders and fiberglass wisps, with a bundle of pens in his hand. May I also mention that he rolled his eyes.